| ID | 099838 |
| Title Proper | Ethnic democracy debate |
| Other Title Information | how unique is Israel? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Berent, Moshe |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Sammy Smooha's "ethnic democracy" model challenged the notion of the uniqueness of Israel by setting it as the archetype of a special type of democracy: "ethnic democracy". But contrary to what Smooha suggests, Israel's national identity is indeed unique. In each of Smooha's East European examples, besides the concept of a core ethnic nation, exists the notion of a civic territorial nation, which makes possible the integration or 'assimilation' into the dominant culture of those who are not members of the core ethnic nation. Yet, Israel's national identity does not recognise the existence of a civic territorial nation and makes no provisions for the integration or assimilation of non-Jews, especially Arabs, into the dominant Hebrew culture. Setting Israel as an archetype for his model prevents Smooha from exploring the possibility that, unlike Israel, East European "ethnic democracy" could be a transitional phase towards a liberal democracy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nations and Nationalism Vol. 16, No. 4; Oct 2010: p.657-674 |
| Journal Source | Nations and Nationalism Vol. 16, No. 4; Oct 2010: p.657-674 |
| Key Words | East Europe ; Estonia ; Ethnic Democracy ; Israel ; Latvia ; Sammy Smooha ; Slovakia |