Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:768Hits:18915533Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID100824
Title ProperPerestroika ten years after
Other Title Informationreflections on methodological diversity
LanguageENG
AuthorYanow, Dvora ;  Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)One of the primary concerns driving Perestroika was the hegemony of quantitative methods in American political science research, curricula, journals, and positions, to the exclusion of qualitative and interpretive approaches. In this article, we assess the contemporary methodological diversity of U.S. political science, at the APSA in particular, to see what, if anything, has changed over the last 10 years. This is an admittedly rough assessment, as the deadline for this symposium did not allow time to repeat the research projects that started Perestroika's and our own solo and joint efforts, the latter preceding and then intersecting with the former. We therefore give a broad overview of methods-directed activities, although we cannot help but see events through the lens of our own involvement in them, and that view is perforce partial.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 43, No. 4; Oct 2010: p. 741-745
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 43, No. 4; Oct 2010: p. 741-745
Key WordsPerestroika ;  Methodological Diversity ;  APSA