Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1479Hits:19788745Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID101470
Title ProperFrom Nordic neutrals to post-neutral Europeans
Other Title Informationdifferences in Finnish and Swedish policy transformation
LanguageENG
AuthorMoller, Ulrika ;  Bjereld, Ulf
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article analyses the foreign policy of two post-neutral EU member states, Sweden and Finland. Both these Nordic states have adjusted their past policies of neutrality in favour of extended participation in the European and transatlantic security community. Yet within a similar and comparable pattern of change, there are two very significant differences between them: their views towards future membership in NATO and their choice of military strategy. The article utilizes an analytical framework that treats neutrality as an institutionalized idea containing causal and principled beliefs. The persistence of neutrality as a guiding principle of policy depends on feedback regarding: (1) its strategic usefulness (implications for security) as well as (2) its social appropriateness (implications for identity). The feedback mechanisms are related in the sense that the self-interested element of military non-alignment for the sake of security needs to be compensated by an appropriate role, such as demonstrating responsibility and engagement in international issues. Having taken a more autonomous decision, although with a historical record of shortcomings as regards declared neutrality, Sweden has been more dependent than Finland in ensuring that its respective policy of neutrality is complemented by an appropriate international role. This was possible during the Cold War, yet became increasingly difficult after the collapse of the bipolar world order. Thus, the analysis undertaken suggests, paradoxically, that in order to remain militarily non-aligned, Sweden has come to favour a more European outlook at the expense of the integrity of its policy of neutrality.
`In' analytical NoteCooperation and Conflict Vol. 45, No. 4; Dec 2010: p363-386
Journal SourceCooperation and Conflict Vol. 45, No. 4; Dec 2010: p363-386
Key WordsEuropeanization ;  Feedback Mechanism ;  Foreign Policy ;  Identity ;  Military Non-alignment ;  Neutrality ;  New Institutionalism ;  Security ;  Sweden