| ID | 101482 |
| Title Proper | Hegemonic illusion |
| Other Title Information | traditional strategic studies in context |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Miller, Steven E |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | At the heart of Buzan & Hansen's (2009) narrative is a conflict dynamic that pits traditional strategic studies, narrow and overly militarized but dominant, against a diverse set of challengers who aim to widen and deepen the field. Gradually, the challengers erode the hegemonic position of the traditionalists. This analysis reflects the assumptions, premises, and perceptions that Buzan & Hansen bring to this project as protagonists in the camp of the challengers. The present article offers a traditionalist response to this narrative, suggesting that the evolution of the field looks very different when viewed through the lens of traditional strategic studies. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 41, No. 6; Dec 2010: p639-648 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol. 41, No. 6; Dec 2010: p639-648 |
| Key Words | Insecurity ; Security ; International Security Studies ; Copenhagen School ; Strategic Studies |