| ID | 102387 |
| Title Proper | Flexible responses |
| Other Title Information | NATO reactions to the US nuclear posture review |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Muller, Harald |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The 2010 US Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) received more attention in European NATO member states than did its predecessor, the 2001 NPR, thanks in large part to President Barack Obama's 2009 Prague speech and to the context of work on NATO's new strategic concept. The pivotal issue for most NATO states was how to handle the US sub-strategic nuclear weapons that remain in Europe. NATO member states perceived the issue differently, depending on the security interests and preferences of the country; each state read into the NPR what matched its preferences best, from an encouragement to pursue nuclear disarmament to a rather conservative preservation of the existing deterrence system. The reactions of five NATO states-France, Estonia, Poland, Germany, and Norway-illustrate this. There is widespread consent that the US sub-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe are militarily obsolete, but some countries ascribe to them a certain political-symbolic function, be it as the "glue of the alliance" or as disarmament showstoppers. Ultimately, the NPR did not end the existing cleavages on the issue of US nuclear weapons based in Europe, but rather postponed resolving them. The current way out for NATO is to move the issue to negotiations with Russia-if Russia is game. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 18, No. 1; Mar 2011: p.103 - 124 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 18, No. 1; Mar 2011: p.103 - 124 |
| Key Words | NATO ; France ; Estonia ; Poland ; Germany ; Norway ; United States ; Nuclear policy ; Nuclear Weapons ; Nonproliferation |