| ID | 103118 |
| Title Proper | Opposition movements, liberalization, and civil war |
| Other Title Information | evidence from Algeria and Chile |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Daxecker, Ursula E |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | When does bargaining between government and opposition groups turn violent? In this article, I argue that groups with cohesive, developed organizational structures are less likely to engage in conflictual behavior. Opposition movements are often divided into moderate and radical challengers, and groups without developed organizational structures cannot limit radicals' demands. The argument is supported in a comparative analysis of bargaining processes in Algeria and Chile in the late 1980s. In Algeria, the primary opposition group was marred by internal divisions and tensions between radical and moderate elements. When the party emerged victorious in democratic elections, the government feared that radical elements would soon take over, canceled election results and attempted to reestablish control by using force. Opposition parties in Chile, however, presented a cohesive and unified alternative to the Pinochet regime, which contributed to a peaceful transfer of power. |
| `In' analytical Note | Civil Wars Vol. 11, No. 3; Sep 2009: p.234 - 254 |
| Journal Source | Civil Wars Vol. 11, No. 3; Sep 2009: p.234 - 254 |
| Key Words | Opposition Movements ; Liberalization ; Civil War ; Algeria ; Chile |