Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:399Hits:19891304Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID103191
Title ProperSocial dialogue and industrial relations in South Korea
Other Title Informationhas the tripartite commission been successful?
LanguageENG
AuthorHan, Chonghee ;  Jang, Jiho ;  Kim, Sunhyuk
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper analyses the sweeping changes in industrial relations in South Korea that have taken place since democratisation in 1987, which gave workers the right to organise themselves, and critically reviews the development of social dialogue since the financial crisis of 1997. A number of international labour specialists have maintained that social dialogue plays an important role in enhancing economic restructuring and the stability of industrial relations in order to compete in a global economy. Contrary to the positive assessment of social dialogue, the paper argues that the Korean Tripartite Commission has not reduced the antagonism between unions and employer organisations due to the influence of embedded, state-led economic development. The financial crisis of 1997 merely provided a catalyst to propel the 'historic compromise' of February 1998, without creating effective institutional arrangements to maintain social dialogue. It is worth noting that the uncertainty of social dialogue results from the inability of the Korean Tripartite Commission to encourage employers and workers to trade off wage restraint for job security in the context of a lack of social welfare protections. The paralysed Korean Tripartite Commission provides fertile ground for reflecting on the complex relationship between social dialogue and institutional arrangements.
`In' analytical NoteAsia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 51, No. 3; Dec 2010: p.288-303
Journal SourceAsia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 51, No. 3; Dec 2010: p.288-303
Key WordsAntagonistic Industrial Relations ;  Democratisation ;  Financial Crisis ;  Institutional Arrangements ;  Social Dialogue