Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1093Hits:18513213Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID103720
Title Proper100 Horsemen and the empty city
Other Title Informationa game theoretic examination of deception in Chinese military legend
LanguageENG
AuthorCotton, Christopher ;  Liu, Chang
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)We present game theoretic models of two of the most famous military bluffs from history. These include the legend of Li Guang and his 100 horsemen (144 BC), and the legend of Zhuge Liang and the Empty City (228 AD). In both legends, the military commander faces a much stronger opposing army, but instead of ordering his men to retreat, he orders them to act in a manner consistent with baiting the enemy into an ambush. The stronger opposing army, uncertain whether it is facing a weak opponent or an ambush, then decides to flee and avoid battle. Military scholars refer to both stories to illustrate the importance of deception in warfare, often highlighting the creativity of the generals' strategies. We model both situations as signaling games in which the opponent is uncertain whether the general is weak (i.e. has few soldiers) or strong (i.e. has a larger army waiting to ambush his opponent if they engage in combat). We then derive the unique Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium of the games. When the probability of a weak general is high enough, the equilibrium involves mixed strategies, with weak generals sometimes fleeing and sometimes bluffing about their strength. The equilibrium always involves the generals and their opponents acting as they did in the historical examples with at least a positive probability. When the probability of a weak general is lower (which is reasonable given the reputations of Li Guang and Zhuge Liang), then the unique equilibrium always involves bluffing by the general and retreat by his opponent.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol. 48, No. 2; Mar 2011: p.217-223
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol. 48, No. 2; Mar 2011: p.217-223
Key WordsBluffing ;  Deception ;  Deterrence ;  Game Theory ;  Signaling Game