Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:667Hits:19972365Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID104043
Title ProperShared human rights norms and military conflict
LanguageENG
AuthorPeterson, Timothy M ;  Graham, Leah
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The normative transfer thesis posits that systematic discrimination, inequality, and repression are indicative of violent norms within states, which extend to the realm of foreign policy. In this article, the authors contend that the pacifying influence of similarity conditions the impact of physical integrity norms at the dyad level. Although mutual norms of domestic nonviolence are more pacifying than mutual disregard thereof, the authors argue that a wide disparity in norms is more aggravating than shared violent norms. This follows because similarity of abusive norms may preclude certain conflicts of interest from originating. The authors test this argument on data from 1981 to 2001, finding that conflict initiation is more likely when states have disparate levels of respect for physical integrity rights. The authors find evidence for a conditional norm transfer, as mutually respectful dyads are least likely to experience conflict; however, they also find evidence of a somewhat weaker peace between abusers.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 55, No. 2; Apr 2011: p248-273
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 55, No. 2; Apr 2011: p248-273
Key WordsHuman Rights ;  Military Conflict ;  Normative Transfer Thesis