| ID | 104441 |
| Title Proper | Resource curse |
| Other Title Information | a legal perspective |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Viñuales, Jorge E |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyzes the different dimensions of the so-called resource curse hypothesis from the perspective of international and domestic law. The analysis is structured as a commentary of the views of the UK-based philosopher Leif Wenar and the Swiss philosopher Peter Schaber on this issue. The article concludes that, under current legal arrangements, states remain the main guarantors of the public good of the people living under their sovereignty. Thus, for better or worse as long as, from a political or an ethical standpoint, peoples are sovereign, they will also continue to assume the main responsibility for their own development even when their house is not in order. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Governance Vol. 17, No. 2; Apr-Jun 2011: p197-212 |
| Journal Source | Global Governance Vol. 17, No. 2; Apr-Jun 2011: p197-212 |
| Key Words | Resource Curse ; Resource Ownership ; International Law ; Domestic Law ; Ogoni ; Equatorial Guinea |