| ID | 105182 |
| Title Proper | Coercion and (Global) justice |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Valentini, Laura |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice (in general) are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice (in particular). Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice. |
| `In' analytical Note | American Political Science Review Vol. 105, No.1; Feb 2011: p.205-220 |
| Journal Source | American Political Science Review Vol. 105, No.1; Feb 2011: p.205-220 |
| Key Words | Coercion ; Global Justice ; Global Socioeconomic Justice |