| ID | 105240 |
| Title Proper | Doctrinal cycles and the dual-crisis of 1979 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Badie, Dina |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Though presidential doctrines claim to be broad, forward-looking articulations of national security principles, they are in fact reactive and narrow. They emerge following crises and can subsequently constrain security policy, creating ideal conditions for new crises to emerge. This paper thus argues that in the pursuit of security, presidential doctrines can perpetuate a cycle of instability. Using the Nixon Doctrine as the present case study reveals that the strategy first came as a response to the failure in Vietnam, then rendered the US unable to foresee or manage the events of 1979: the Iranian Revolution and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. These crises subsequently forced a wholesale reassessment of security in the form of the Carter Doctrine. In examining this period of US-Middle East relations, the constricting, reactive nature of doctrines and the concomitant cycles of instability become self-evident. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Perspectives Vol. 12, No. 2; May 2011: p.212-230 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Perspectives Vol. 12, No. 2; May 2011: p.212-230 |
| Key Words | Doctrines ; Foreign Policy ; Detente ; Nixon ; Carter |