| ID | 106001 |
| Title Proper | Countering the effects of IED systems in Afghanistan |
| Other Title Information | an integral approach |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Dietz, A Steven |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The current approach to countering the threat of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Afghanistan has met with limited success. The relative lack of success may be in part because the current approach is not holistic and discounts the social systems that foster the IEDs. Insurgents are using IEDs as a tool to further their strategic aims, but the coalition and to a lesser extent the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) are attacking the IEDs as if they are an end in and of themselves. Combining network disruption with information change maximizes the opportunities for mitigating the IED threat. More specifically, to mitigate the IED threat requires disrupting the social and economic systems associated with IEDs, and at the same time providing alternative economic opportunities and improving rule of law and governance at the local level. In other words, counter-IED (C-IED) must be Counter-Insurgency (COIN) centric to be successful. This paper reviews the current state of C-IED efforts, identifies five main problems with the current approach, and suggests changes to reduce or mitigate the IED threat in Afghanistan. |
| `In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 22, No. 2; May 2011: p. 385-401 |
| Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 22, No. 2; May 2011: p. 385-401 |
| Key Words | Improvised Explosive Devices ; Integral Model ; Counter - Insurgency ; Social Systems ; Systems Theory |