Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:553Hits:19920541Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID106254
Title ProperMultilateralism and democracy
Other Title Informationa dissent regarding Keohane, Macedo, and Moravcsik
LanguageENG
AuthorGartzke, Erik ;  Naoi, Megumi
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In an article printed last year in International Organization, Keohane, Macedo, and Moravcsik argued that multilateral organizations (MLO) could actually be good for democracy. We argue that KMM discount the prospect that MLO influence can be detrimental to democracies not because MLOs are "distant, elitist, and technocratic" but precisely because MLOs are highly political. International organizations have much to offer in improving the welfare of citizens and facilitating coordinations among states. They are not likely to improve procedural functions of democracies without a cost that itself is problematic for democracy.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol. 65, No. 3; Summer 2011: p.589-598
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol. 65, No. 3; Summer 2011: p.589-598
Key WordsMultilateralism ;  Democracy ;  International Organizations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text