| ID | 106453 |
| Title Proper | Coercion and control |
| Other Title Information | explaining India's victory at Kargil |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bommakanti, Kartik |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article argues that most analyses of the Kargil conflict concede the important role played by the United States in understanding how India regained control of the Kargil heights, but fail to explain how India's intra-war compellent threat forced Washington to bring irresistible pressure to bear on Islamabad. The Indian decision to threaten asymmetrical escalation was the result of domestic pressures and military difficulties facing the Vajpayee-led caretaker government. The article shows that Washington pursued an "impartially" interventionist strategy until it came under Indian pressure to forsake its "balanced" approach towards ending the conflict. The article also shows how the "asymmetry of motivation" between New Delhi and Washington was an important factor in terminating hostilities in India's favor. |
| `In' analytical Note | India Review Vol. 10, No. 3; Jul-Sep 2011: p283-328 |
| Journal Source | India Review Vol. 10, No. 3; Jul-Sep 2011: p283-328 |
| Key Words | India ; Kargil ; War ; Kargil War ; Victory |