Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1476Hits:19825174Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID106464
Title ProperSecuritizing trade
Other Title Informationthe case of the Korea-US free trade agreement
LanguageENG
AuthorSohn, Yul ;  Koo, Min Gyo
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Korea-US free trade agreement (KORUS FTA) of 2007 clearly shows how countries simultaneously pursue economic benefits and strategic interests in trade negotiations. This study argues that the surprise launch and the successful conclusion of the KORUS FTA illustrate the joint efforts by the United States and the Republic of Korea to re-securitize their bilateral economic relations. Security and strategic calculations held by top policy-makers on both sides catalyzed the official launch of FTA negotiations by removing a number of longstanding trade irritants such as Korea's screen quotas and ban on US beefs. At the post-negotiation stage, however, the lack of bipartisanship-particularly in the United States-to provide trade liberalization for their allies in favor of their own broader strategic interests has led to the legislative stalemate of executive efforts at re-securitization of trade relations. This study concludes that the stalemated ratification process shows the erosion, not the strength, of US power to provide security and trade liberalization as public goods.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 11, No. 3; 2011: p.433-460
Journal SourceInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 11, No. 3; 2011: p.433-460
Key WordsSecuritizing Trade ;  Korea - US Free Trade Agreement ;  Trade Negotiations ;  KORUS FTA ;  Bilateral Economic Relations ;  United States ;  Trade Liberalization ;  Broader Strategic Interests ;  Re - Securitization of Trade Relations