Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:346Hits:19957334Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID106582
Title ProperWhat are you prepared to do? NATO and the strategic mismatch between ends, ways, and means in Afghanistan-and in the future
LanguageENG
AuthorJohnson, David E
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) operations in Afghanistan as a way to get at the strategic disconnects in ends, ways, and means that the author believes are endemic to large-scale protracted stability and COIN (counterinsurgency) operations against adversaries who do not pose palpable existential threats to the members of an alliance. The article focuses mainly on the period that followed President Barack Obama's December 2009 announcement of a civilian and military "surge" in Afghanistan through the early stages of the ISAF offensive in Marjah, which began in February 2010. The article concludes that the fundamental strategic issue is that the Allies are not willing (or able) to devote enough resources to achieve their stated objectives. No matter how much the "Ways" might be improved, the "Means" are not sufficient to attain the "Ends." Thus, what is needed is a more realistic understanding of what ISAF can accomplish in Afghanistan and what NATO might be expected to accomplish in future operations.
`In' analytical NoteStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 34, No. 5; May 2011: p.383-401
Journal SourceStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 34, No. 5; May 2011: p.383-401
Key WordsNATO ;  Afghanistan ;  International Security Assistance Force ;  ISAF ;  Fundamental Strategic Issue ;  Marjah ;  Future Operations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text