| ID | 106623 |
| Title Proper | Transcending the great foreign aid debate |
| Other Title Information | managerialism, radicalism and the search for aid effectiveness |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gulrajani, Nilima |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The great aid debate pits those who are radically opposed to foreign aid against those who champion its managerial reform to achieve greater aid effectiveness. This article offers an analysis of the debate by introducing a heuristic distinction between aid 'radicals' and aid 'reformers'. The radical position is notable as it uncharacteristically unites neoliberals and neo-Marxists against foreign aid, while reformers espouse the tenets of managerialism as an ideological and practical vehicle for aid's improvement. Radicals remain sceptical and suspicious of reformist managerial utopias, while aid reformers see little value in radical nihilism. The paper calls for an end to the great aid debate by moving to a discussion of foreign aid that intertwines both radical and reformist perspectives. The 'radical reform' of foreign aid is both desirable and achievable so long as aid is re-theorised as a contested, commonsensical, contingent and civically oriented endeavour. |
| `In' analytical Note | Third World Quarterly Vol. 32, No. 2; 2011: p199-216 |
| Journal Source | Third World Quarterly Vol. 32, No. 2; 2011: p199-216 |
| Key Words | Foreign Aid ; Managerialism ; Radicalism ; Radical Reform ; Aid Management |