| ID | 106959 |
| Title Proper | Assessing the balance |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Brooks, Stephen G ; Wohlforth, William C |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Save for the single issue of balance of power theory's relevance to the current system, where we and some of our critics are in real disagreement (and they are wrong), every aspect of this symposium has been highly productive. Our critics do not directly dispute the proposition that a rapid end of a single superpower world is extremely unlikely. They generally endorsed our core finding that the systemic constraints featured in IR scholarship are largely inoperative with respect to a United States that remains the sole superpower. These essays are consequently devoted mainly to discussing the implications of our findings and the future research agenda. In particular, they developed serious challenges to the idea of US led institutional revisionism, generated new ideas about both systemic and non-systemic constraints, and suggested potentially powerful theories about constraints on other states besides the United States. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 2; Jun 2011: p201-219 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 2; Jun 2011: p201-219 |
| Key Words | Power Theory ; Power Balance ; United States ; Foreign Policy ; Activism |