| ID | 107285 |
| Title Proper | International leadership and norm evolution |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Xuetong, Yan |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Since the end of the Cold War, fast-paced globalization has increased interaction among states and promoted development of international norms in many fields. Constructivists argue that international interactions can only advance international norms towards a Kantian culture of friendly mutual help and could not propel any regression to a Hobbesian culture of hostile confrontation.1 We can observe, however, that the reality of international politics does not support this argument. Although certain interactions have promoted international cooperation, others have intensified international conflicts. For instance, China, the United States, Russia, Japan, South Korea and North Korea held during the five years from August 2003 to December 2008 seven rounds of Six Party Talks on nuclear issues on the Korean Peninsula. The six nations' continuous interaction during this period, however, resulted not in North Korea's acceptance of the norm of non-proliferation, but in its conducting on May 25 2009 its second nuclear test.2 This example calls to question whether or not interaction among states drives international norms in one specific direction. Drawing on the Pre-Qin philosophers' idea that the type of monarch has different impacts on relations among states, this article analyses how the different types of leadership of a leading power influence the process and direction of evolution of international norms. |
| `In' analytical Note | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 4, No. 3; Aut 2011: p233-264 |
| Journal Source | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 4, No. 3; Aut 2011: p233-264 |
| Key Words | International Leadership ; Leadership ; International Norms ; World War II |