Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:338Hits:19952738Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID107466
Title ProperPublic response to an Anthrax attack
Other Title Informationreactions to mass prophylaxis in a scenario involving inhalation Anthrax from an unidentified source
LanguageENG
AuthorSteelFisher, Gillian ;  Blendon, Robert ;  Ross, Laura J ;  Collins, Blanche C
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)An attack with Bacillus anthracis ("anthrax") is a known threat to the United States. When weaponized, it can cause inhalation anthrax, the deadliest form of the disease. Due to the rapid course of inhalation anthrax, delays in initiation of antibiotics may decrease survival chances. Because a rapid response would require cooperation from the public, there is a need to understand the public's response to possible mass dispensing programs. To examine the public's response to a mass prophylaxis program, this study used a nationally representative poll of 1,092 adults, supplemented by a targeted focus on 3 metropolitan areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001: New York City (n=517), Washington, DC (n=509), and Trenton/Mercer County, NJ (n=507). The poll was built around a "worst-case scenario" in which cases of inhalation anthrax are discovered without an identified source and the entire population of a city or town is asked to receive antibiotic prophylaxis within a 48-hour period. Findings from this poll provide important signs of public willingness to comply with public health recommendations for obtaining antibiotics from a dispensing site, although they also indicate that public health officials may face several challenges to compliance, including misinformation about the contagiousness of inhalation anthrax; fears about personal safety in crowds; distrust of government agencies to provide sufficient, safe, and effective medicine; and hesitation about ingesting antibiotic pills after receiving them. In general, people living in areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001 had responses similar to those of the nation as a whole.
`In' analytical NoteBiosecurity and Bioterrorism Vol. 9, No.3; Sep 2011: p.239-250
Journal SourceBiosecurity and Bioterrorism Vol. 9, No.3; Sep 2011: p.239-250
Key WordsPublic Response ;  Anthrax Attack ;  Mass Prophylaxis ;  Anthrax ;  Unidentified Source ;  United States