| ID | 107532 |
| Title Proper | Emergency and escape |
| Other Title Information | explaining derogations from human rights treaties |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hafner-Burton, Emilie M ; Helfer, Laurence R ; Fariss, Christopher J |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Several prominent human rights treaties seek to minimize violations during emergencies by authorizing states to "derogate"-that is, to suspend certain civil and political liberties-in response to crises. The drafters of these treaties envisioned that international restrictions on derogations, together with international notification and monitoring mechanisms, would limit rights suspensions during emergencies. This article analyzes the behavior of derogating countries using new global data sets of derogations and states of emergency from 1976 to 2007. We argue that derogations are a rational response to domestic political uncertainty. They enable governments facing serious threats to buy time and legal breathing space from voters, courts, and interest groups to confront crises while signaling to these audiences that rights deviations are temporary and lawful. Our findings have implications for studies of treaty design and flexibility mechanisms, and compliance with international human rights agreements. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Organization Vol. 65, No. 4; Fall 2011: p.673-707 |
| Journal Source | International Organization Vol. 65, No. 4; Fall 2011: p.673-707 |
| Key Words | Human Rights Treaties ; Political Liberties ; Monitoring Mechanisms ; International Human Rights Agreements ; Emergency ; Human Rights |