| ID | 107570 |
| Title Proper | Improving transparency |
| Other Title Information | revisiting and revising the BWC's confidence-building measures |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Hunger, Iris ; Dingli, Shen |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The confidence-building measures (CBMs) under the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) have been only moderately successful in enhancing transparency because of the limited participation of state parties and the poor quality of the data provided. In the absence of a verification protocol for the treaty, the CBMs constitute the primary means by which most treaty members can gain information useful for evaluating whether states are abiding by their treaty obligations. Given their importance, the CBMs need to be refashioned: in some areas the measures should be expanded to cover additional categories of life sciences activities directly relevant to treaty compliance and in other areas trimmed back to allow other organizations to handle activities closely related to their core missions and capabilities. This article explains the importance and function of transparency in the context of dual-use activities, reviews the evolution and the current status of the CBMs, identifies gaps and redundancies in the coverage of CBMs, and introduces proposals to transform the CBMs over time into stronger proto-declarations that can truly serve as source of information helpful in making judgments about compliance with the BWC's prohibitions. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 18, No.3; Nov 2011: p.513-526 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 18, No.3; Nov 2011: p.513-526 |
| Key Words | Biological Weapons Convention ; Confidence - Building Measures ; Verification and Compliance ; Transparency |