Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:366Hits:19890853Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID107662
Title ProperNo news is good news
Other Title Informationthe longevity of Australian humanitarian interventions
LanguageENG
AuthorAbdiel, Douglas
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Australian government and military have maintained humanitarian interventions for far longer than any comparable U.S. humanitarian intervention. This longevity confounds most traditional international relations theories. It seems that the key variable is public support for humanitarian interventions. The U.S. public quickly grew impatient with humanitarian operations, while the Australian public has not yet done so. Two reasons for the Australian public's forbearance are explored. First, the idea that the Australian military and government are proficient at these operations and that the public supports these operations because it "loves a winner" is found wanting. Second, innate differences between the United States and Australia, particularly regarding news media, are explored; these differences seem to be highly correlated with the longevity of the operations. It seems likely that the Australian public does not hear enough about these operations to be concerned about them or question their utility, efficacy, or cost.
`In' analytical NoteArmed Forces and Society Vol. 37, No. 4; Oct 2011: p. 571-597
Journal SourceArmed Forces and Society Vol. 37, No. 4; Oct 2011: p. 571-597
Key WordsNews Media ;  Australia ;  Humanitarian ;  Military ;  Duration ;  Public Support


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text