| ID | 108056 |
| Title Proper | Risk in international relations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Clapton, William |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Risk is a concept that has recently filtered through into International Relations (IR). However, the literature on risk, risk management and IR is still comparatively small and there is still significant scope for the theorisation of these concepts in an IR context. Thus far, the literature on risk and IR has been largely characterised by the debate between critical realist, constructivist and post-structuralist approaches to risk. At the core of these debates is the ontological question of whether risks are 'real' or not. However, this article will suggest that these ontological debates have grown stale and are unhelpful to furthering the research agenda on risk and IR. As this article will demonstrate, we need to systematically develop ways for both explaining risk identification, assessment and management -what might be termed 'riskisation' - and why particular forms of risk management emerge in particular situations and not others. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol. 25, No. 3; Sep 2011: p.280-295 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol. 25, No. 3; Sep 2011: p.280-295 |
| Key Words | Post - Structuralism ; Risk ; Risk Society ; Riskisation |