| ID | 108247 |
| Title Proper | United States and the ICC |
| Other Title Information | the force and farce of the legal arguments |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | O'Keefe, Roger |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The article outlines US dissatisfaction with the International Criminal Court (ICC), before assessing the strengths and weaknesses of US objections from the point of view of international law. It concludes that most of the concerns expressed by the United States are either overstated or legally flawed but that there is good reason to object to the abrogation, for the purposes of trial before the ICC, of the immunities conferred by international law on at least certain US personnel. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 3; Sep 2011: p.335-355 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 3; Sep 2011: p.335-355 |
| Key Words | International Criminal Court (ICC) ; International Law ; United States ; Legal Arguments |