Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:698Hits:19971185Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID108490
Title ProperMobilising uncertainty and the making of responsible sovereigns
LanguageENG
AuthorAalberts, Tanja E ;  Werner, Wouter G
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The past few decades have witnessed a fundamental change in the perception of threats to the security of states and individuals. Issues of security are no longer primarily framed in terms of threats posed by an identifiable, conventional enemy. Instead, post-Cold War security policies have emphasised the global and radically uncertain nature of threats such as environmental degradation, terrorism and financial risks. What are the implications of this transformation for one of the constitutive principles of international society: state sovereignty? Existing literature has provided two possible answers to this question. The first focuses on the alleged need for states to seek international cooperation and to relax claims of national sovereignty. In Ulrich Beck's terminology, this would amount to a transformation of sovereign states into 'cosmopolitan states'. The second takes the opposite position: in response to uncertain threats states rely on their sovereign prerogatives to take exceptional measures and set aside provisions of positive law. In Beck's terminology, this would amount to the creation of a 'surveillance state'. None of these two answers, however, does justice to the complex relation between sovereignty, power and (international) law. As this article will show, the invocation of radical uncertainty has led to a transformation in sovereignty that cannot be captured in terms of the cosmopolitan/surveillance dichotomy. What is at stake is a more fundamental transformation of the way in which sovereignty is used to counter threats. Based on a study of the UN Counterterrorism Committee, this article demonstrates how state sovereignty is used as a governmental technology that aims to create proactive, responsible subjects.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol. 37, No. 5; Dec 2011: p.2183-2200
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol. 37, No. 5; Dec 2011: p.2183-2200
Key WordsSecurity ;  Conventional Enemy ;  Post - Cold War Security Policies ;  Terrorism ;  Financial Risk


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text