Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:782Hits:19981912Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID108658
Title ProperFit for what? Towards explaining battlegroup inaction
LanguageENG
AuthorBalossi-Restelli, Ludovica Marchi
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The thrust of this paper concerns the case of the European Battlegroup (BG) non-deployment in late 2008, when the United Nations requested European military support for the United Nations Organisation Mission peacekeeping force in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The argument is built on the fact that when, in official documents, the EU approaches the European security and ESDP/CSDP's military crisis management policy and interventions, it makes strong references to the United Nations and the UN Charter Chapter VII's mandate of restoring international peace and security. Such references make it seem that supporting the UN when it deals with threats and crises is a primary concern of the EU and the member states. These allusions lead to the main contention of this paper, that there is much ambivalence in these indications. The paper develops its argument from one key hypothesis; namely, that the non-deployment of a European BG in the DRC, at the end of 2008, constitutes a useful case study for detecting a number of ambiguities of the EU in respect of its declarations in the official documents establishing the European military crisis management intervention structure.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Security Vol. 20, No. 2; Jun 2011: p.155-184
Journal SourceEuropean Security Vol. 20, No. 2; Jun 2011: p.155-184
Key WordsEuropean Battlegroup ;  Common Security and Defence Policy ;  DRC 2008 ;  Military Crisis Management


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text