| ID | 108712 |
| Title Proper | Imperfect jewel |
| Other Title Information | military theory and the military profession |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Winton, Harold R |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article explores a perennial theme in the literature of strategic studies: the relationship between military theory and the military profession. It begins with a conceptual analysis of this relationship. It then investigates what military theorists themselves have had to say about the utility of their craft. It concludes by assessing the actual influence of military theory on selected individuals and institutions. The individuals are George S. Patton, Jr., and Ulysses S. Grant. The institutions are the United States Army and the United States Air Force in the late twentieth century. The fundamental finding is suggested in the title: military theory can indeed be quite useful in the maturation of military commanders and in the development of martial institutions, but it is not always necessary and by no means perfect. It should thus be studied assiduously but used with caution. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 34, No. 6; Dec 2011: p.853-877 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 34, No. 6; Dec 2011: p.853-877 |
| Key Words | Military Theory ; Military Profession ; Military Doctrine ; Military Education ; Command in War ; George S Patton ; Ulysses S Grant |