| ID | 109174 |
| Title Proper | G8 1/2 |
| Other Title Information | the EU's contested and ambiguous actorness in the G8 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Huigens, Judith ; Niemann, Arne |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyses the degree of European Union (EU) actorness within the Group of Eight (G8). Drawing on the work of Jupille and Caporaso, actorness is probed along the criteria of recognition, authority, cohesion and autonomy. We argue that the vague, flexible and informal nature of the G8 has contributed to rather nuanced and ambiguous degrees of actorness. When assessing the above criteria, overall the EU's actorness remains questionable. As for recognition, while the EU is treated as an equal by other G8 delegations, actual membership remains disputed, and third parties such as the media remain reluctant to accept EU representation as equal. Authority in terms of legal competence tends to be of lesser importance in the G8, given the informal nature of this institution. Informally, the Commission has managed to enhance its authority when it can provide substantial expertise. Cohesion has proven perhaps the most limited aspect of EU actorness. Although value cohesion is substantial, there are no formal mechanisms that tie the European participants together. Commission autonomy in the G8 is considerable in terms of its own separate institutional apparatus, as well as formal performance and compliance scores that differ from those of the European G8 members. However, ultimately the Commission's freedom of action usually remains subject to the control of its principals. Yet, EU actorness tends to differ per context as our tentative analysis of the factors conducive to autonomy indicates. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 4; Dec 2011: p.629-657 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 24, No. 4; Dec 2011: p.629-657 |
| Key Words | European Union ; G8 ; Autonomy |