Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:832Hits:19878754Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID109584
Title ProperWhere do third parties intervene? third parties' domestic institutions and military interventions in civil conflicts
LanguageENG
AuthorKoga, Jun
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Do democracies and autocracies intervene militarily in different types of civil conflict? In contrast to the existing literature that makes no distinction between military interventions undertaken by democracies and those by autocracies, I argue that democracies and autocracies are likely to intervene in different types of civil conflict. Specifically, I find that an increase in the rebel capabilities and the existence of an ethnic tie between the rebel group and the third-party state will increase the probability of a military intervention favoring the rebel group only when a third-party state is democratic. The evidence also shows that an autocracy is more likely to intervene when there are lootable natural resources such as secondary diamonds in a civil conflict, but there is no effect of lootable resources on a democracy's intervention decision. The analytical framework in this paper can apply to other types of military behaviors and would provide a more accurate picture of the effect of regime type on foreign policy choices.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 55, No. 4; Dec 2011: p.1143-1166
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 55, No. 4; Dec 2011: p.1143-1166
Key WordsDomestic Institutions ;  Military Interventions ;  Civil Conflicts ;  Democracy ;  Foreign Policy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text