| ID | 109594 |
| Title Proper | Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? towards a just securitization theory |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Floyd, Rita |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | While securitization studies have paid considerable attention to the moral value of desecuritization, they have paid almost no attention to the morality of securitization. In this article, I attempt to rectify that situation by proposing a revision of securitization theory that specifies three criteria that - if fulfilled at the same time - would render a securitization morally right. The criteria are: (1) that there is an objective existential threat; (2) that the referent object of security is morally legitimate; and (3) that the security response is appropriate to the threat in question. Although what is suggested here is considerably removed from the Copenhagen School's original securitization theory, it is akin to that framework insofar as it retains the functional distinction between the security analyst and the securitizing actor. Indeed, the development of criteria that determine the moral rightness of securitization is analogous to the Copenhagen School's devising criteria that determine both the existence and the success of securitization. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 42, No. 4-5; Aug-Oct 2011: p.427-439 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol. 42, No. 4-5; Aug-Oct 2011: p.427-439 |
| Key Words | Securitization Theory ; Objective Threats ; Intentions ; Copenhagen School ; Just/Morally Right Securitization |