Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:341Hits:19939457Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID109599
Title ProperGlobal land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets
LanguageENG
AuthorHavlĂ­k, Petr ;  Schneider, Uwe A ;  Schmid, Erwin ;  Bottcher, Hannes
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Recently, an active debate has emerged around greenhouse gas emissions due to indirect land use change (iLUC) of expanding agricultural areas dedicated to biofuel production. In this paper we provide a detailed analysis of the iLUC effect, and further address the issues of deforestation, irrigation water use, and crop price increases due to expanding biofuel acreage. We use GLOBIOM - an economic partial equilibrium model of the global forest, agriculture, and biomass sectors with a bottom-up representation of agricultural and forestry management practices. The results indicate that second generation biofuel production fed by wood from sustainably managed existing forests would lead to a negative iLUC factor, meaning that overall emissions are 27% lower compared to the "No biofuel" scenario by 2030. The iLUC factor of first generation biofuels global expansion is generally positive, requiring some 25 years to be paid back by the GHG savings from the substitution of biofuels for conventional fuels. Second generation biofuels perform better also with respect to the other investigated criteria; on the condition that they are not sourced from dedicated plantations directly competing for agricultural land. If so, then efficient first generation systems are preferable. Since no clear technology champion for all situations exists, we would recommend targeting policy instruments directly at the positive and negative effects of biofuel production rather than at the production itself.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 39, No. 10; Oct 2011: p.5690-5702
Journal SourceEnergy Policy Vol. 39, No. 10; Oct 2011: p.5690-5702
Key WordsBiofuels ;  Land Use Change ;  Modelling