Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1192Hits:19472789Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID109909
Title ProperField research in conflict environments
Other Title Informationmethodological challenges and snowball sampling
LanguageENG
AuthorCohen, Nissim ;  Arieli, Tamar
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Conducting research in conflict environments is a challenge, given their complexity and common attitudes of distrust and suspicion. Yet, conflict and methodology are usually analyzed as separate fields of interest. Methodological aspects of field work in conflict environments have not been systematically analyzed. This article addresses the central methodological problems of research conducted in conflict environments. We suggest the use of the snowball sampling method (hereafter, SSM) as an answer to these challenges. The effectiveness of this method has been recognized as significant in a variety of cases, mainly regarding marginalized populations. We claim that in conflict environments, the entire population is marginalized to some degree, making it 'hidden' from and 'hard to reach' for the outsider researcher. The marginalization explains why it is difficult to locate, access and enlist the cooperation of the research populations, which in a non-conflict context would not have been difficult to do. SSM directly addresses the fears and mistrust common to the conflict environment and increases the likelihood of trusting the researcher by introduction through a trusted social network. We demonstrate how careful use of SSM as a 'second best' but still valuable methodology can help generate cooperation. Therefore, the evaluation of SSM, its advantages and limitations in implementation in conflict environments can be an important contribution to the methodological training of researchers. In addition to its effectiveness under conditions of conflict, SSM may, in some cases, actually make the difference between research conducted under constrained conditions and research not conducted at all. Together with our experiences in the field, we supply several insights and recommendations for optimizing the use of SSM in a conflict environment.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol. 48, No. 4; Jul 2011: p.423-435
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol. 48, No. 4; Jul 2011: p.423-435
Key WordsConflict ;  Field Research ;  Methodology ;  Middle East ;  Snowball Sample


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text