ID | 109956 |
Title Proper | Between treaty and treason |
Other Title Information | Dutch collaboration with warlord Teuku Uma during the Aceh War, a case study on the collaboration with indigenous power-holders in colonial warfare |
Language | ENG |
Author | Kitzen, Martijn |
Publication | 2012. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Recent counterinsurgency experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan have demonstrated that the local operating environment often is dominated by indigenous power-holders. As counterinsurgents seek to establish control over the local population, collaboration with these agents has become an essential aspect of contemporary counterinsurgency. Although the practice of constructing collaborative relationships with indigenous power-holders might be perceived as unconventional by today's counterinsurgents, the approach itself goes back to the colonial era in which modern counterinsurgency has its roots. This article explores the dynamics, benefits, and dangers of collaborative relationships with indigenous power-holders by analysing an infamous episode in Dutch colonial history, the case of the collaboration between Dutch colonial authorities and warlord Teuku Uma during the Aceh War (1873-1913). This relationship ended in disaster for the Dutch as Uma departed their side at the moment he had become their pivotal asset in the local political landscape. The article explains that the Dutch succeeded to co-opt Uma, but failed to control him as they lacked the will and means to do so. Furthermore this case study provides an insight in the way the Dutch colonial authorities dealt with the complex process of intelligence-gathering in a fragmented indigenous society. |
`In' analytical Note | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 23, No.1; Mar 2012: p. 93-116 |
Journal Source | Small Wars and Insurgencies Vol. 23, No.1; Mar 2012: p. 93-116 |
Key Words | Aceh ; Collaboration ; Colonial Warfare ; Counterinsurgency ; Dutch East Indies ; Ethnographic Intelligence ; Indigenous Power - Holders |