Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:790Hits:20022141Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID110302
Title ProperContaining Iran's missile threat
LanguageENG
AuthorElleman, Michael
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In 2007 Washington announced that it would place long-range interceptors in Poland and an advanced missile-tracking radar in the Czech Republic as part of a larger system (known as the Third Site, after Ft Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg AFB, California) designed to protect the US mainland from the emerging Iranian ballistic missile threat. Moscow objected to the placement of missile-defence assets in Europe, claiming that their presence threatened Russia's nuclear deterrent forces. After a congressionally mandated review of US missile-defence plans, US President Barack Obama decided in September 2009 to shelve the Third Site architecture in favour of deploying proven regional systems better suited to protecting against Iran's current and near-future capabilities. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said the decision had been driven 'almost exclusively by the change in intelligence and better technology'. Known as the European Phased Adaptive Approach (PAA), the new missile-defence strategy provided US policymakers with the capacity to deploy systems of increasing capability in phases and in accordance with the threat posed by Iran's missiles.
`In' analytical NoteSurvival : the IISS Quarterly Vol. 54, No.1; Feb-Mar 2012: p.119-126
Journal SourceSurvival : the IISS Quarterly Vol. 54, No.1; Feb-Mar 2012: p.119-126
Key WordsIran ;  Missile Threat ;  Poland ;  Emerging Iranian Ballistic Missile Threat ;  Barack Obama ;  United States ;  Russia's Nuclear Deterrent Forces ;  Intercontinental - Range Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) ;  European Missile Defence ;  Europe ;  Russia’s Nuclear Deterrent Forces


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text