| ID | 110320 |
| Title Proper | Does Libya represent a new Wilsonism? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gelb, Leslie H ; Buchanan, Patrick J ; Lynch, Marc |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In the last issue of The National Interest, we ran a cover story by Nikolas K. Gvosdev and Ray Takeyh positing that America's military role in helping bring down Libyan president Muammar el-Qaddafi represented a significant new era in the country's foreign policy-the ascendancy of a doctrine that placed far greater emphasis on humanitarian considerations as a rationale for military interventions overseas. This was a provocative thesis, and the authors' probing analysis and tight argumentation rendered it one that we were proud to display prominently in our journal. But it occurred to us that it certainly didn't represent the last word on the subject of the future of American foreign policy. And so we invited three prominent international-relations thinkers-Leslie H. Gelb, Patrick J. Buchanan and Marc Lynch-to weigh in with their own thoughts on the subject. Their musings follow, along with a final response from Gvosdev and Takeyh, who get the last word as a reward for introducing the subject in the first place. |
| `In' analytical Note | National Interest vol. , No.118; Mar-Apr 2012: p.40-50 |
| Journal Source | National Interest vol. , No.118; Mar-Apr 2012: p.40-50 |
| Key Words | America's Military Role ; Libya ; Qaddafi ; Foreign Policy ; Military Interventions ; American Foreign Policy ; America’s Military Role |