Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:404Hits:19931359Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID110536
Title ProperJudicial review as a response to political posturing
LanguageENG
AuthorFox, Justin ;  Stephenson, Matthew C
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)We use an agency model to analyze the impact of judicial review on the incentives of elected leaders to "posture" by enacting bold but ill-advised policies. We find that judicial review may exacerbate posturing by rescuing leaders from the consequences of unwise policies, but may also discourage posturing by alerting voters to unjustified government action. We further find that judges will defer to the decision of elected leaders unless posturing is sufficiently likely. We then show how judicial review affects voter welfare, both through its effect on policy choice and through its effect on the efficacy of the electoral process in selecting leaders. We also analyze how the desirability of judicial review is affected by characteristics of the leaders and the judges.
`In' analytical NoteAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 105, No. 2; May 2011: p.397-414
Journal SourceAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 105, No. 2; May 2011: p.397-414
Key WordsJudicial Review ;  Political Posturing ;  Electoral Process