| ID | 110827 |
| Title Proper | Tragedy of offensive realism |
| Other Title Information | classical realism and the rise of China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kirshner, Jonathan |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | What is the realist position on how to deal with the rise of China? One prominent realist approach, associated with John Mearsheimer, calls for the US to do whatever it can to slow China's rise. However, while this is a realist perspective, it is not the realist perspective. In particular, realist approaches that derive from a classical foundation suggest policies fundamentally different from those favored by Mearsheimer. This article argues that realism should return to some of its classical traditions. It reviews why, from a classical realist perspective, the rise of China must be viewed with alarm, but argues that Mearsheimer's approach - offensive realism - is wrong, and dangerous. Many of these errors are rooted in structuralism; a classical realist approach, which allows for the influence of history and politics, provides greater analytical purchase and wiser policy prescriptions than offensive realism. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of International Relations Vol. 18, No.1; Mar 2012: p.53-75 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of International Relations Vol. 18, No.1; Mar 2012: p.53-75 |
| Key Words | Classical Realism ; International Relations ; National Security ; Offensive Realism ; Policy Relevance ; Rise of China |