| ID | 110842 |
| Title Proper | Crossed lines |
| Other Title Information | the curious case of the beaufort sea maritime boundary dispute |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Baker, James S ; Byers, Michael |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute has traditionally been understood as involving a wedge-shaped area of maritime space that extends to a distance of 200 nautical miles north of the terminus of the Canada-United States border between the Yukon Territory and Alaska. However, new data collected in pursuit of establishing the limits of the extended continental shelf in the region show that the two countries' seabed resource rights may stretch far beyond the 200-nautical-mile limit of the exclusive economic zone. Significantly, at approximately 200 nautical miles from shore, the U.S.-claimed equidistance line crosses the line claimed by Canada, which follows the 141° W meridian, meaning that the legal positions of the two countries if simply extended beyond the EEZ would appear to favor the other party. This article explores how the United States and Canada might seek to reformulate their legal positions to resolve the dispute. Though these reformulated positions might not reduce the area in dispute, they will clarify it and potentially enable the parties to either delimit a single maritime boundary or choose to implement one of a number of creative solutions to the dispute that are outlined in the article. |
| `In' analytical Note | Ocean Development and International Law Vol. 43, No.1; Jan-Mar 2012: p.70-95 |
| Journal Source | Ocean Development and International Law Vol. 43, No.1; Jan-Mar 2012: p.70-95 |
| Key Words | Arctic Ocean ; Beaufort Sea ; Continental Shelf ; Maritime Boundary Delimitation |