Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:355Hits:19935679Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID110872
Title ProperGhost in the machine
Other Title Informationpension risks and regulatory responses in the United States and the United Kingdom
LanguageENG
AuthorMabbett, Deborah
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The United States has introduced automatic enrollment into retirement savings schemes, and the United Kingdom is in the throes of doing so. The financial crisis has reminded us that returns on these schemes can be poor, even negative. Behavioral economics shows that people can be "nudged" into schemes regardless, but it also implies that the liberal account of market legitimation through informed choice cannot be applied. This article examines how risks are assigned in schemes and how enrollees might seek recourse if their expectations are disappointed. Comparing the United States and the United Kingdom, it argues that enrollees are more likely to seek recourse from the government in the United Kingdom. The explanation can be found in regulatory decisions that reflect the structure of each country's public pension scheme. This structure is conducive to private risk bearing in the United States, but not in the United Kingdom, suggesting that regulatory market liberalism is undermined by a residual approach to public provision.
`In' analytical NotePolitics and Society Vol. 40, No.1; Mar 2012: p.107-129
Journal SourcePolitics and Society Vol. 40, No.1; Mar 2012: p.107-129
Key WordsBehavioral Economics ;  Automatic Enrollment ;  Regulation ;  Pensions