| ID | 111128 |
| Title Proper | Continuing to question the reliability of nuclear deterrence |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wilson, Ward |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Responding to Derrin Culp's critique, the author argues that distinguished nuclear theorists may be wrong because groups of experts have been wrong in the past, that city attacks are central to nuclear deterrence theory because killing civilians en masse is what nuclear weapons do best, and that understanding how effective city attacks would be in war is crucial to understanding how well they would work as threats. Moreover, while it is undeniable that nuclear deterrence works some of the time, this simply is not good enough. Because any failure of nuclear deterrence could end in catastrophic nuclear war, nuclear deterrence must be perfect or almost perfect. This is a very difficult standard to reach. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.1; Mar 2012: p.69-74 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 19, No.1; Mar 2012: p.69-74 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Deterrence ; Nuclear Weapons ; United States ; Soviet Union ; Israel ; United Kingdom |