| ID | 111636 |
| Title Proper | Assigning role characteristics to China |
| Other Title Information | the role state versus the ego state |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Shih, Chih-yu |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper distinguishes and integrates national identity and national image through a deep role analysis. It argues that the meaning of China's rising rests upon the views of those who evaluate China's role playing. This role analysis mediates between international relations and Chinese foreign policy. It also mediates between China watchers and their China. The two dimensions of role-role taking and role making-generate four different discursive approaches to interpreting the rise of China, each in its own way associated with the affects of opportunity and threat. They are "nation state,""civilization,""Tianxia," and "Asianism." In response to the external view on the rise of China, Chinese narrators often take the Tianxia and nation state approaches as components of their conception of national role. These conceptions mediated by role-making and role-taking, evolve into four possible strategic focuses-national interests, imperialism, sovereignty and center-periphery. While this last strategic focus on role-taking has recently attracted enthusiastic response in China, it has been re-appropriated by social science concepts such as soft power and social capital that assume an egoistic role-making China is on the move. |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 8, No.1; Jan 2012: p.71-91 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 8, No.1; Jan 2012: p.71-91 |
| Key Words | National Identity ; China ; Chinese Foreign Policy ; International Relation ; Civilization ; Asianism ; National Interests ; Imperialism |