| ID | 112421 |
| Title Proper | Law, teleology and international relations |
| Other Title Information | an essay in counterdisciplinarity |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Koskenniemi, Martti |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Interdisciplinary approaches often bemoan international law's lack of theoretical sophistication and naïve utopianism. Instead of offering effective tools of governance, it seems committed to outdated ideas about an international public realm and a dubious teleology of progress. This essay - given as the E. H. Carr lecture at the University of Aberystwyth in 2011 - reviews efforts to reform international law into a science and a more efficient instrument of international rule. Such efforts have been a part of international law's internal development but their lack of success depends on a mistaken view of the field as a 'discipline' - a set of theoretical or technical propositions. This essay defends a view of international law as an argumentative practice in which political claims are defended and attacked, rather than as a governance tool or institutional blueprint. At its worst, law may buttress bureaucratic privilege. At its best it may offer, for a cynical world, a vocabulary for imagining better futures. It may also sharpen political thought and strategic awareness, but it cannot replace them. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol. 26, No.1; Mar 2012: p.3-34 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol. 26, No.1; Mar 2012: p.3-34 |
| Key Words | Argumentative Practice ; E H Carr ; History of International Law ; Interdisciplinarity ; International Relations ; International Rules ; Immanuel Kant ; Teleology |