| ID | 112449 |
| Title Proper | Strategic users of culture |
| Other Title Information | German decisions for military action |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schmitt, Olivier |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article looks at cases in which political leaders have engaged in seemingly inconsistent behaviour and explores how they framed and justified their decisions. After showing that strategic culture is composed of different facets, I argue that when faced with conflicting pressures from the international environment and their own national constituencies, political leaders intentionally manipulate facets of their own strategic culture to legitimate a decision, made for contingent reasons, to participate (or not) in a military operation. I illustrate this argument by analysing in depth the decision-making process and public justifications of the German participation in the European and Security Defence Policy (ESDP) mission EUFOR Congo in 2006 and its refusal to militarily participate in a similar mission in Chad in 2007. This conception of strategic culture as both a constraint and a resource for policymakers reinforces our understanding of the boundaries of strategic culture's explanatory power, and provides an explanation of seemingly inconsistent foreign policy behaviours. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.1; Apr 2012: p. 59-81 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary Security Policy Vol. 33, No.1; Apr 2012: p. 59-81 |
| Key Words | Military Action ; German Decisions ; Germany ; European and Security Defence Policy (ESDP) ; Militarily Participate |