Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1327Hits:19848793Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID112478
Title ProperSpatial inequity and national territory
Other Title Informationremapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam
LanguageENG
AuthorLudden, David
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.
`In' analytical NoteModern Asian Studies Vol. 46, No.3; May 2012: p.483-525
Journal SourceModern Asian Studies Vol. 46, No.3; May 2012: p.483-525
Key WordsNational Territory ;  Bengal ;  Assam ;  British India ;  Modern Territorial Politics ;  South Asia ;  Economic Globalization ;  Political Economy ;  Northeast India ;  Bangladesh