| ID | 113137 |
| Title Proper | Can't get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bernauer, Julian ; Vatter, Adrian |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Are citizens in consensus democracies with developed direct democratic institutions more satisfied with their political system than those in majoritarian democracies? In this article, individual-level data from the second wave of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and an updated version of Lijphart's multivariate measure of consensus and majoritarian democracy covering 24 countries are used to investigate this question. The findings from logistic multilevel models indicate that consensual cabinet types and direct democratic institutions are associated with higher levels of citizens' satisfaction with democracy. Furthermore, consensus democracy in these institutions closes the gap in satisfaction with democracy between losers and winners of elections by both comforting losers and reducing the satisfaction of winners. Simultaneously, consensus democracy in terms of electoral rules, the executive-legislative power balance, interest groups and the party system reduces the satisfaction of election winners, but does not enhance that of losers. |
| `In' analytical Note | European Journal of Political Research Vol. 51, No.4; Jun 2012: p.435-468 |
| Journal Source | European Journal of Political Research Vol. 51, No.4; Jun 2012: p.435-468 |
| Key Words | Consensus Democracy ; Direct Democracy ; Satisfaction with Democracy ; Multilevel Modeling ; Winners and Losers |