| ID | 113527 |
| Title Proper | Ending the war in Iraq |
| Other Title Information | the third option |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mason, T David |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Since the war in Iraq began in 2003, public debate over the war has centered on two options: either increase the number of US troops to defeat the insurgency, or withdraw US forces to reduce US losses. Empirical research on civil war termination suggests that neither of these two options is likely to produce a favorable outcome for the US or the Iraqi government. That same research points to the third option - negotiated settlement - that has been the most frequent manner in which civil wars have terminated in the post-Cold War era. I analyze what existing research on civil war termination suggests about how the civil war in Iraq can be brought to an end. Military victory over the insurgents is unlikely, but withdrawal increases the risk of state failure. A negotiated settlement would require a credible third-party mediator to broker an agreement between the government, Sunni insurgents, and Shiite militias, thereby isolating foreign jihadists to spoiler status. Implementation of the settlement and the durability of the peace would be enhanced by multinational peacekeeping forces. |
| `In' analytical Note | Civil Wars Vol. 14, No.2; Jun 2012: p.205-227 |
| Journal Source | Civil Wars Vol. 14, No.2; Jun 2012: p.205-227 |
| Key Words | Iraq ; War ; Civil War Termination ; Civil War ; Sunni Insurgents ; Shiite Militias |