Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:553Hits:19916543Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID113817
Title ProperToward a completely constructivist critical terrorism studies
LanguageENG
AuthorStump, Jacob L ;  Dixit, Priya
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper uses Patrick Thaddeus Jackson's monism/dualism distinction to clarify ongoing methodological debates among students of critical terrorism studies (CTS). We map the distinction onto the CTS literature and emphasize the distinctive ontological starting points and the distinctive epistemological frameworks entailed by each perspective. Then we critically engage monistic, or interpretivist, CTS research, especially that of Richard Jackson. We argue for a more methodologically explicit and logically consistent interpretivist CTS and we suggest three important steps that researchers can take to achieve this aim: (i) take an explicit ontological stance; (ii) embrace reflexivity; (iii) conceptualize terrorism as a meaning-making practice.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Relations Vol. 26, No.2; Jun 2012: p.199-217
Journal SourceInternational Relations Vol. 26, No.2; Jun 2012: p.199-217
Key WordsConstructivism ;  Critical Terrorism Studies ;  Interpretivism ;  Methodology ;  Terrorism