| ID | 113850 |
| Title Proper | Towards a radical concept of praxis |
| Other Title Information | imperial common sense versus the post-modern prince |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gill, Stephen |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article argues for a radical conception of praxis in international relations. By praxis is meant those forms of critical theoretical and practical activity that are not only linked to understanding, explaining and acting in international relations but also transforming those relations to help constitute a more ethical, just and sustainable world order. The argument is developed as follows: (1) discussion of theoretical perspectives, and how they constitute dominant paradigms of International Relations in the West, particularly in the USA. Such dominant paradigms are shaped by a liberal ontology, opposed to Marxism and critical theory. (2) A critique of 'imperial common sense' that is bound up with US supremacy in an unjust world of deepening crises, growing inequality, social dislocations and unsustainable accumulation. Here my argument involves a dialectical strategy that critically addresses the nature, self-evidence and global influence of mainstream American International Relations. (3) A discussion of how new forms of praxis are emerging, seeking to develop radical alternatives that are sober, imaginative, sustainable and politically and ethically credible - in the multiple, diverse and new forms of political agency reflected in the figure of the 'post-modern Prince'. The article concludes by outlining elements of a radical research agenda to address significant intellectual, ethical and public policy issues in the emerging world order. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 40, No.3; Jun 2012: p.505-524 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 40, No.3; Jun 2012: p.505-524 |
| Key Words | Imperial Common Sense ; Post - Modern Prince ; Praxis |